UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONS ON-LINE

Where it does not appear either by express averment or by a necessary intendment from any matter stated in the case, nor does any entry on the record of the cause in the supreme court of the state show, that any of the questions of which this Court is entitled to take cognizance under the terms of the 25th section of the Judiciary Act, arose in the cause and were actually decided by that court, the writ of error must be dismissed, for the want of jurisdiction.

As the decision of the court was that the record did not show any ground of jurisdiction under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act, it will be proper to state what that record was.

The acts of 1833 and 1851 are recited in the opinion of the court, and need not be repeated.

The rector and church wardens were assessed for taxes upon several pieces of property, amongst which was the following:

Lower Delaware Ward, No. 8 Cherry Street, Hospital lot &c., $126.

They paid the tax upon the whole assessment, including the above, under protest, and then brought an action in the state court to recover the amount so paid. The court decided in favor of the defendants. Upon being carried to the supreme court of the state, that court reversed the judgment of the court below, so far as respected the tax upon the Hospital lot. The rector and church wardens, believing that the whole of the property ought to be exempted from taxation, brought the case to this Court. The question which they intended to raise clubjuris

Page 61 U. S. 27

was, whether or not the act of 1833 was a contract, irrepealable except with their consent. But the record presented only the following state of facts.

"March Term 1853, No. 145. Docket Entries."

"The Rector, Church Wardens, and Vestrymen, of Christ H. M. WATTS"

"Church, in the city of Philadelphia, in trust for Christ 145"

"Church Hospital v. The County of Philadelphia W. D. BAKER"

Summons case ret'ble the first Monday of June, 1853, exit 11th May, 1853.

"Service accepted."

March 3d, 1854. Case stated in the nature of a special verdict filed.

April 1, 1854 -- Judgment entered without argument for defendants by the court. By writing filed, it is agreed that the above case may be removed by the plaintiffs to the supreme court, without any recognizance being given by them. Eo die assignments of errors filed.

April 4, 1854 -- Argued.

December 27, 1854 -- Reargued.

March 12, 1855 -- Opinion by C.J. Lewis, judgment reversed, and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in error for the sum of one hundred and twenty-six dollars, with costs. Eo die opinion filed.

The case was submitted on a printed argument, by Mr. Watts and Mr. Meredith for the plaintiffs in error, and Mr. Porter for the defendants.